Developers grilled over revised plans to build 705 homes on Tolworth's Toby Jug site

Developers faced a grilling as they presented renewed plans to build 705 homes on Tolworth’s Toby Jug site – more than a decade after designs first surfaced.

European investment firm Meyer Bergman aims to build the homes on the site in Hook Rise South near Tolworth station. It will also build a doctor’s surgery, nursery, convenience store and 356 car parking spaces. It presented its second planning application at a Development Control Committee pre-decision meeting at the Richard Mayo Centre, in Eden Street, last night. A previous application was rejected in March due to its “scale and density”.?

The renewed proposals, developed by architecture firm JTP, include the removal of the two tallest blocks, which were 15 and 18 storeys in height, and the creation of a town square.

Transport for London (TfL) said the application fit with its plan for London, and that any traffic concerns had been alleviated. But residents and councillors questioned why the number of homes – 705 – had not changed from the previous application.

Councillors on the committee were not allowed to comment for procedural reasons, but did question the developers on air quality, density and why they had chosen only to submit an outline application. Previous owners Tesco submitted their first planning application for the Toby Jug site in 2005, but struggled to gain planning permission for almost a decade amid fierce opposition from residents. The application will be decided at a Development Control Committee meeting at the Guildhall on Wednesday, July 6.

Comments

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Filtered words will be replaced with the filtered version of the word.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

By posting content on Surbiton.com, you agree to adhere to the following guidelines.

  • Your username and password must only be used by you, keep them safe. If a posting is made using your username and password it will be considered to have been posted by you. If you have a friend who wants to use our site and post messages on the site, show them how to register.
  • Be courteous at all times, inciting racial hatred, posting abusive, obscene, threatening, harassing, defamatory, libellous or sexually explicit material or any material that is found to be offensive is not acceptable and we may suspend your username and password.
  • Retaliating to offensive posts causes more problems for other users on the discussion boards. Just report such messages to us using the Feedback link which is available at the top of every page or the 'report this' link associated with individual postings. We will act on every report we receive.
  • Please respect other people's work and do not post material that infringes copyright.
  • Do not post information that you know to be confidential or sensitive or otherwise in breach of the law. You should only post material that you know to be public knowledge. If you have any doubts do not post it on the site.
  • Never attempt to gain unauthorised access to any area of the site. This is known as hacking and is illegal.
  • Content posted represents the opinions of the author, and does not represent the opinions of Surbiton.com or its affiliates and has not been approved or issued by Surbiton.com. You should be aware that the other participants are strangers to you and may make statements which may be misleading, deceptive or wrong.
  • Spoofing or posing as another user is unacceptable. Anonymous users' postings should always be considered with suspicion.
  • Help keep Surbiton.com a safe place for information and opinion. Please alert us of any anti-social behaviour as described above.
Please note that Surbiton.com does not monitor the comments posted and we are therefore reliant upon users reporting antisocial behaviour.